Voodoo Lies Under Oath

It took awhile, but Voodoo Louie Castle finally went right off the edge. Besides being a chronic, leading internet liar, Voodoo Louie now claims, under color of law, he is intimidated.

The WFFCW is apparently having an effect on Voodoo Louie's ability to think lucidly and reason clearly, and it's showing more and more often. His logic is slowly disappearing, and I believe insanity may be taking over.

It isn't affecting his honesty, because that never existed anyway.

As Billy Preston sang: "Nothin' From Nothin' Leaves Nothin'!"

Voodoo Louie Castle vs. Steve Leigh

Cowering in fear like a battered, beaten housewife,

Voodoo Louie Castle petitioned the Los Angeles Superior Court for a restraining order on December 29, 2004.

The petition clearly states, "This is not a Court Order".

Voodoo Louie lied under oath.

I was served with a copy of the petition on January 14, 2005 by local Florida deputies.

This illustrates that Voodoo Louie Castle will do anything to retaliate against the WFFCW (meaning me) - including his world known, internet proven, never ending misrepresentation of facts. In other words, LYING. Lying, fabricating, and false statements are a way of life for Voodoo Louie Castle. For Voodoo Louie, the truth won't do. Lies are better.

Strangely, Voodoo Louie left out the really important part:

I had him photographed and interrogated by aliens from outer space.

They implanted mind control devices in his head as their spacecraft hovered over Disneyland.

The situation is really ludicrous, but you might enjoy it. Click on the pictures below to read Voodoo Louie's exact words, in his own nearly illegible handwriting, which he swore were truth, in numerous places, under oath.

There are several Voodoo Louie Castle falsifications contained on this page - and there's more to come. Let's take a look at this page first. Please read the wording on the form, particularly 6(c), 8, and 9.

Note the fine print at the bottom of this page: "(This is not a Court Order)".

Now let's consider the facts:

• I haven't been within approximately 3,000 miles of California since 1997 or 1998.

• I've been disabled for several years. My left arm and hand are partially disabled.

• I've had two strokes within 10 days - in December 1999 and January 2000.

• I have leukemia.

• I've been almost 100% housebound - with rare exceptions - since approximately 2001.

• My body weight fluctuates from ~96 to 106 pounds. Currently I'm ~104. I'm a real dangerous threat .... yessuh!

Voodoo Louie swore under oath I "threatened" to "come to visit him". Voodoo Louie is insane.

"Visiting" Voodoo Louie could not possibly be further from the truth.

Being housebound, I rarely travel 2 miles to visit my doctor - never mind "visit" Voodoo Louie Castle, located approximately 3,000 miles away from Tampa, Florida, somewhere in the Los Angeles area.

BUT - Even if I actually wanted to "visit" Voodoo Louie Castle - which I do not, never have, and never will - the facts are clear:

• I wouldn't have the slightest idea where he is located.

• I don't want to know where he is.

• I wouldn't recognize him if he was standing right in front of me.

• I couldn't afford the airfare or handle the stress of airports.

• I don't want to be anywhere NEAR the liar.

• I'm assuredly not walking to California, under any circumstances.

Voodoo Louie additionally swore under oath that I threatened to "kick his ass". Voodoo Louie is insane.

My "ass kicking" days were over by 1999, prior to my illness and strokes. The strokes were the major reason why I stopped training dogs. I sold my dog training school - my body simply can't keep up with it any longer. Years ago, I could, and did, work 12 dogs a day. Those days are long, long gone.

Voodoo Louie Castle swore under oath that I threatened him with physical violence and made a dozen phone calls to him.

As usual, Voodoo Louie is insane.

He endlessly manipulates partial facts to suit himself and fit his lies of the moment. In doing so, he ignores facts and invents more lies and exaggerations.

First, I don't threaten anyone with "physical violence". At ~104 lbs, that fact would be obvious to anyone. One good punch from a 100 lb. woman would likely put me in a coma forever.

Second, my phone bill clearly indicates exactly five calls in a 14 day period. After checking with my phone provider, I learned that any call, even a 1 second call, is billed at a minimum of 1 minute.

• 9/06/2004 at 10:33pm EST – 2 minutes or less

• 9/07/2004 at 2:33am EST – 1 minute or less

• 9/09/2004 at 1:11am EST – 1 minute or less

• 9/16/2004 at 12:20am EST – 1 minute or less

• 9/19/2004 at 2:20am EST – 4 minutes or less

Either my phone bill is lying, or Voodoo Louie Castle is lying.

SOMEBODY is lying.

I trust the accuracy of my phone bill.

I say Voodoo Louie Castle is lying.

The first call was made requesting that Voodoo Louie kindly not answer the phone, so I could leave a voice mail message for posterity and his clear, concise understanding. Voodoo Louie refused this polite request, thus the second, third, and fourth calls. I never left a message for Voodoo Louie - he was apparently very afraid of a message.

The FINAL call (9/19) was made by another person - that person happens to be the Pastor of a large Presbyterian Church. He politely asked Voodoo Louie about his "seminar schedule". I never said a word. The Pastor asked where and when Voodoo would be offering training seminars, and received no answers - none. That was the phone call billed at 4 minutes or less.

The plot thickens: in late September, I received a phone call from some woman claiming to be "a detective from LAPD". I handed the phone to my attorney. The "detective" refused to discuss Voodoo Louie's "annoying phone call report" with my attorney, and insisted she speak only to me. She attempted to interrogate me about this website, asked about someone named "Captain Haggerty", and demanded printed copies of the entire website to be faxed to her. I stated I don't own a fax machine. After repeated demands, she still couldn't comprehend that I don't own a fax machine.

Approximately a week later, she phoned again. I gave her my attorney's phone number (for the fourth time) and advised her to contact him with her questions.

She claimed she had phoned and spoken with my attorney THREE times, and he would not cooperate.

My attorney advised me he never received a phone call from this "detective".

Apparently everybody has a problem telling the truth out there in the Los Angeles area. Apparently "LAPD detectives" don't believe I have the right to be represented by an attorney, either.

Conspicuously, the "detective" did not mention one word about "threats", "kicking ass", "physical violence", or "coming to visit" - she only asked about "annoying phone calls". That's simply amazing, isn't it?

See BRAND NEW LOU, September 6, 2004 for details and a screen capture from Frawley's own "webboard", in which Voodoo Louie vividly describes these imaginary phone calls.

This link will illustrate that Voodoo Louie's fabrications - I mean LIES - are completely, totally in conflict with his own sworn statements!

Why did I call Voodoo Louie? Here's why: During that time, approximately September 6, 2004, I publicly offered to completely remove the Voodoo Louie section of the WFFCW - IF Louie could come up with any valid proof of his dishonest public accusations and misrepresentations regarding me. This offer can be seen at this link as well as other links. Voodoo Louie Castle was unable to provide even one instance of valid proof of his falsified claims, known commonly as "lies".

Voodoo Louie Castle is well educated in ways to manipulate California's legal system to cause harassment. Although this is expected and typical Voodoo Louie Castle behavior, it's not having any effect. The Voodoo Louie section remains.

ADDENDUM:

I'm not sure exactly how much meaning this may have. It may mean something, it may mean nothing. I received this privately, and don't know exactly what to make of it, but here's the story.

A very well known, highly respected handwriting expert examined this document. She also made it clear that without examining the original, there remained questions. I've never seen the original, it was retained by Los Angeles Superior Court - only a copy was sent to me. This is what the handwriting analyst wrote regarding the page:

This person's handwriting show an unstable personality. The baseline is wavy indicating a possible bi-polar condition and a definite emotional rollercoaster. The hooks at the bottom of the poorly printed block letters denote a tendency toward violence. The entire look of the writing is degraded and uncared for, a sign of possible dementia or onset of mental disease. The downward cross on several of the "h"s and "a" show intense disappointment. Is/was this Louis Castle person in construction?