The World Famous Frawley Castle Website
■■■ Copyright Notice ■■■
VIDEO FILES are in Flash Player (.flv) format. AUDIO FILES are in .mp3 format.
designed for viewing at widescreen resolution - 24" monitor - 1920x1080
The WFFCW was created August 5, 2001 :: we're 16 YEARS OLD!
WHAT IS THIS WEBSITE ABOUT? Some of this is a personal website containing REBUTTAL, REPLY, and COMMENT to (primarily) public statements and accusations made by various self proclaimed "internet dog training experts". The majority of the statements and accusations are FALSE, and refer to me, personally. The nucleus of this website is based on verbatim quotes of public messages, most of which are archived with their respective lists. Unless noted, nothing has been altered, other than formatting line length to screen width and changing the font style. Other parts of this site contain OPINIONS, HUMOR, PARODY, COMEDY, and SARCASM which reflect my own personal sense of humor and viewpoints. The First Amendment of the Constitution adequately, particularly, and specifically provides these rights. This site is for educational and entertainment purposes. This is emphatically not a "hate" site. There is no hate, and never was. Profanity is kept to a minimum, but it does exist. If this website seems offensive to you, in any way, please leave now. Please do not subject yourself to being offended.
TO THOSE IN FEAR OF THIS WEBSITE: Websites can be terrifying places. If you're afraid, we'll never understand why, but what can WE do? You're allowed to be frightened of webpages, or anything else. This website contains NO THREATS of any nature - no direct, indirect, implied, supplied, or personified threats - it never did and never will. There is a lot of SARCASM here. If you're afraid, our heart goes out to you - we don't WANT you to be afraid. We want you to get help. Dial 911, and scream for help. If you wind up in a straight jacket, that's your problem. If you don't, that's your problem, too.
COPYRIGHT © is clearly acknowledged where, when, and if applicable. It's even acknowledged where it's not applicable. The USCO website. This link contains verbatim United States Copyright Law, which clearly allows for rebuttal, comment, criticism, etc. United States Copyright Law specifically states "COPYRIGHT DOES NOT APPLY TO FACTUAL INFORMATION". (Read the law - see for yourself.) Rebutting falsified "factual information" is not a violation of copyright law.
IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE I'M TRUTHFUL, DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL SCREEN CAPTURES
IF I'M NOT 100% HONEST AND ACCURATE, CALL ME A LIAR and CONFRONT ME WITH FACTS
Frawley Gets Kicked Out of Texas
Frawley's whining and moaning because he got tossed off the TEXAS K-9 POLICE ASSOCIATION chat list. Poor Ed. This is an interesting article, and it shows that Frawley doesn't learn anything at all from his past stupidity. Looking for conflict is Frawley's lifetime specialty, you'll see that below.
You may also notice that Frawley complains about other people doing to him exactly what he does to other people.
So when Frawley does it, it's acceptable, and when others do it to Ed, it's unacceptable. Poor, poor Ed. How can anyone mistreat poor Ed this way?
Unlike Frawley's ridiculous Table Training article, I didn't even bother copying this whole article. If you want to read his complete, unabridged whining stupidity, it's located someplace on his expert "LEERKOPF™ web board". There are a couple of installments, because Frawley has a LOT of badmouthing to let out. I just quoted the parts that I felt like commenting on, and trashed the rest.
Frawley's text is RED
Steve Leigh's text is BLUE
How I Got Kicked Off The Texas Police K-9 Association Chat List
By Ed LEERKOPF™ Frawley
(hey! Ed forgot
his copyright shit, so I'll put some in for him)
©©©© four last longer than one, right?
"After being on a couple internet e-mail chat lists (and talking to a number of other people who have been on other lists), I have come to the conclusion that these so-called open discussions on dog training are nothing more than self fulfilling proficiencies and extension of the egos of the people that run the lists (they are called list moderators.) I say this after just getting kicked off the TEXAS K-9 POLICE ASSOCIATION chat list."
Dear God! "self fulfilling proficiencies"? What IS this?
Do YOU have any "self fulfilling proficiencies"?
Do you know where to get some?
"This K-9 list is supposedly a list dedicated to the open discussion of police K-9 training issues. After being on the list for several months I found it anything but that. To get on the list you need to be a police officer or a retired police officer with an interest in K-9. The list moderator's name is Kathleen Weaver, a truly bizarre woman who is not a cop. To begin with, that contradiction should have sent up flags. To describe this woman as temperamental would be a gross understatement."
Ain't this something? In the LEERKOPF™ corner we've got Frawley, and in the TK9PA corner, we've got Kathleen.
"I guess one of my problems is that when I have an opinion on something that I strongly believe in I don't voice my opinion in a humble enough way."
Frawley GUESSES? He isn't SURE?
"That can ruffle the feathers with people on the other side of the fence. I fully admit to this."
Would you look at this? The little whiner "fully admits" that he caused the freaking problem, then has the unmitigated nerve to complain about it!
"On more than one occasion (after sleeping on the issue), I have sent private e-mails to people apologizing for the way that I worded my comments."
Isn't that a pity. Frawley should have slept on it FIRST, and done his yipyapping SECOND. This is the exact same situation that gave birth to THIS website. Too much of Frawley trying to ram his attitude down somebody else's throat. And SOMEBODY refusing to lay down and take it.
"While I was not chastised for my comments on this subject, it was evident that I ruffled a few Texas feathers."
Then they ruffled FRAWLEY'S feathers in response. Too bad, Frawley.
"So then I get this nasty e-mail from Kathleen Weaver (who I have renamed the list moderator from hell)."
She can't hold a candle to our own "table expert", Ed LEERKOPF™ Frawley.
"She warned me that "I was already on probation with the list""
I sure do feel sorry for Frawley.
"I also told her that I was not impressed with her threatening e-mails. OOOPPPPS AGAIN ED!!!"
Oooppps? No. TYPICAL. Frawley would starve himself for a week rather than miss an opportunity for conflict. He thinks he's a GENUINE EXPERT, and a BADASS, too.
"The next morning I got an e-mail from Marcus Cook saying that I was kicked off the list."
Let's all buy Marcus Cook a drink. Too bad he couldn't throw Frawley in jail for 90 days, too.
"He indicated they would review my position in 30 days and maybe (if I was a good boy) they would let me back on again."
Let Frawley back on? What for? More discrediting? Why did Frawley start his LEERKOPF™ kindergarten board ..... so he can't get banned!
"list members had complained about the way I make my points. YEH RIGHT MARCUS!"
Above, the idiot admits he expresses himself like an arrogant asshole, and then here he denies it.
"Marcus's e-mail reminded me of that old saying - "don't shit a shitter!!!""
Now THERE'S a subject Frawley knows intimately. Bullshit is Frawley's "self fulfilling proficiency".
"The moral of this story is that these chat lists are not all what they seem. They are closely audited and controlled. The fact is that they are one-sided extensions of the agendas of the list moderators."
That sure sounds like Frawley and his LEERKOPF™ puppets, doesn't it? You wanna see "one-sided" and "agendas"? Just read a few Frawley pages!
Here's Frawley trying to intimidate and put the list moderator in her place:
I kind of take this e-mail as a threat. I hope that you don't mean it like that because I am the wrong person to threaten over something like this.
I suggest you release this message and be very careful about how you write your e-mail.
When you feel like an apology I will be waiting.
There's that LEERKOPF™ Frawley arrogance showing again. Too much attitude, and FAR too stupid to know when to shut up.
What's real interesting about all this bullshit, is how Frawley REPRINTS other people's messages on his little webpage, so we can all see his moronic opinions. But when somebody ELSE reprints FRAWLEY'S messages, then that's all different ..... that's THEFT of "copyright material".
See how it works? Frawley invents rules and laws to suit himself on the spur of the moment.